Chronological news and opinion links from Cascadia Center's web site, updated regularly.
On May 7, 2007, Cascadia Center presents a special day long symposium at the Microsoft Conference Center in Redmond, Washington, titled, "Jump Start To A Secure, Clean Energy Future." An array of special guests will give presentations and participate in panel discussions on Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and renewable fuels. Cascadia's Web page on the event provides a draft agenda, online registration, directions, and six sections of informational resource links.
We welcome your comments on posts at Cascadia Prospectus. In fact, we'd really like to see more reader comments here, so let 'em rip! The only constraints are: no personal attacks and no profanity. We welcome civil dissent and a robust exchange of views. To add your voice to the conversation, click on "comment" from the bottom of any blog article here. Then simply scroll to the bottom of the page, where you will see the comment box and several lines above, to be filled in. (If you have arrived at one of our blog posts via a link, you will already be on a "permalink" page, and the comment box at bottom plain to see.)
Please follow these simple steps to leave a comment. On the designated lines:
1) Fill in your name (psuedonyms are just fine, but real names are always appreciated).
2) Then add one of your e-mail addresses. It will absolutely NOT be shared with any commercial service whatsoever or used by us in any way whatsoever - however the blogging software requires it for your comment to be accepted. If you are still not comfortable providing your main e-mail address, you can provide a secondary e-mail address, such as a gmail account.
3) If you have a Web site, you can put the address in the slot labelled "URL," however this is optional.
4) Then proceed to the text box, and add your comment. Please check for spelling, style and syntax (using the "Preview" feature if you wish). Then after any final edits you make, click on "Post." Please note: comments are quickly reveiwed before publishing.
PRIVATE COMMUNICATIONS WITH BLOG EDITOR: Your private comments, suggestions or story tips to the editor of the blog, Matt Rosenberg, are very much encouraged. Please click on "E-mail Editor," which is one of several links bordering our blog masthead.
Welcome to Cascadia Prospectus, the group blog of the Cascadia Center. Here, our group of contributors - Cascadia staff and fellows - will aim for the sweet spot between vision, accountability and investment; providing news, commentary and insight on transportation, trade and technology. Our scope will be worldwide, but with a particular focus on the future of the vital and unique Cascadia region; the states of Washington and Oregon, and the Canadian province of British Columbia.
We'll seek to examine and illuminate best practices and the necessary long-term perspective on transportation planning, funding and governance. We'll also report and comment on regional economic development; energy and environment; the intersections of technology with trade and transportation; and urban planning.
A related part of our mission is to serve as an information clearinghouse. For your convenience, we'll be archiving our blog posts here under various sub-categories which are each easily accessed from a main page hub. We'll also be seeking to build out useful links to research; selected media and blogs; and agencies and institutions. We'll share here what we're learning as Cascadia continues to enagage expert researchers, and organize conferences, such as our May 7 symposium at the Microsoft Conference Center in Redmond, "Jump Start To A Secure, Clean Energy Future."
Your voice is an important ingredient here. Please feel encouraged to add comments to the blog posts, after viewing our comment tips and policy. We also welcome feedback on the blog and story tips; please click on "E-Mail Editor."
This is a tech-only post, to register this blog with the blog search engine Technorati.
In an editorial yesterday titled, "Don't Bury Streamlined Transportation Planning," the Everett Herald states it plainly:
If November's joint (roads and transit) vote in Snohomish, King and Pierce counties is to succeed, voters will have to be convinced that they'll get their money's worth. Merging the planning and funding of regional transit and highways - functions currently under the separate wings of Sound Transit, the Puget Sound Regional Council, the Regional Transportation Invesment District and the state Department of Transportion (whew!) - under a single, accountable commission would be a step toward winning voter trust.
One version of such a commission is contained in ESSB 5803, which passed the Senate earlier this month. The House Transportation Committee is considering its own bill, and an amendment to shelve the creation of a new regional body could be introduced as early as today.
Other media supporters of transportation governance reform for Central Puget Sound include the Seattle Times editorial board, Seattle Post-Intelligencer columnist Joel Connelly, and Seattle Times Sunday columnist (and editorial page editor) James Vesely.
ESSB 5803 stems from the final report of the Regional Transportation Commmission study group tasked last year by the legislature and Governor Chris Gregoire with investigating restructured transportation governance for the region. Headed by former Western Wireless CEO John Stanton and former Seattle Mayor Norm Rice, the study group wrote in its final report, issued Dec. 31, 2006:
...the system has to be structurally re-knit at the regional level....Transportation represents an enormous financial challenge to the region....Three interrelated strategies need to be implemented:
- Emply user fees (tolls, fares, parking charges) to manage demand for transportation - these should reduce demand and thus the amount of construction that must be funded.
- Raise more money from a combination of tax increases and user fees.
- Prioritize projects throughout the region and across modes so that the most important projects get built.
The challenge with prioritizing is establishing who is in charge. Today there are 128 agencies that manage aspects of transportation in the four-county region. If 128 parties are theoretically in charge of a problem, we concluded that in fact no one is really in charge.
It is reasonable to wonder whom such arrangements truly benefit. Certainly not taxpayers and commuters. Accountability must be more than just a buzzword.